Additions to the site in 2003
To read some of the publications (those marked with this
sign), you will need to have the free Acrobat Reader software installed. You can download this program by clicking here . Before you do that bookmark this page so you can return here afterwards.
| Section 60 code response | |
| Response to the Scottish Executive's consultation on the code of practice to be issued under section 60 of the Freedom of Information (Scotland) Act providing guidance to public authorities on best practice. Added November 2003 | |
| FOI "needs higher profile" | |
| Press release warning that Scottish public authorities need to do more to prepare for the Freedom of Information (Scotland) Act. Added 26 September 2003 | |
| FOI Act will have teeth only if it is seen as a symbol of honesty | |
| This letter to the Financial Times followed an article on the Hutton Inquiry. The letter argues that the government, which is looking at ways of restoring its credibility, should commit itself to the FOI Act, and start by renouncing the veto. Added September 2003 | |
| 'A window on the mind of No 10 | |
| This article, which appeared in the Guardian on 29 August 2003, comments on the implications of the Hutton Inquiry for open government. It argues that any serious attempt by the Government to restore trust must be based on a policy of openness, regardless of whether the facts are incovenient or embarrassing. | |
| 10 July 2003 | |
| Government "puts two fingers up to openness code and Ombudsman". Added 10 July 2003 | |
| Code of Practice
on Access to Government Information - Guidance on Interpretation 600 kb |
|
| The Campaign has produced an electronic version of the Government's Guidance on Interpretation of the open government code. This has not been available on the Internet before and has been reproduced with the permission of the Department for Constitutional Affairs (formerly the Lord Chancellor's Department). | |
| Challenge to secrecy over private sector staff in Whitehall | |
| Updated June 2003. Code of Practice requests and correspondence with government departments over revealing the identities of private sector staff working on secondment in government departments. Government departments initially refused to identify seconded staff, claiming that the Data Protection Act prohibited them from doing so unless the individuals themselves agreed to be indentified. The Campaign argued that the DPA permitted disclosure even where the individuals had refused consent. After three years of correspondence the government finally accepted that the Campaign's view was correct. | |
| Data Protection
Act subject access consultation response 164
kb |
|
| The Campaign has published its response to the consultation by the Lord Chancellor's Department on the subject access provisions of the Data Protection Act. It is calling for people to have the right (a) to know when information has been withheld from them under one of the DPA exemptions; (b) to be able to appeal to the Information Tribunal against decisions of the Information Commissioner, and (c) for the DPA exemptions to be made subject to a public interest test. Added March 2003 | |
| Broken commitments on access to health records | |
| The Campaign has challenged the Department of Health's refusal to reveal papers of a body advising ministers about the fees charged to patients asking to see their health records. Although the Department claims that releasing any of the papers would harm the frankness of internal discussion, the Campaign points out that independent members of the body have been told that they are free to circulate the papers within their own organisations. The Campaign has also revealed that official guidance on access to health records breaks explicit commitments made by ministers to Parliament and says that the public interest now requires disclosure. Added 25 February 2003 | |
| 'Freedom of Information' | |
| This article by Maurice Frankel on the FOI Act appeared in the October/November 2002 edition of 'Progress' magazine. Added 14 January 2003 | |
| What was new in 2002 | |
| What was new in 2001 | |
| What was new in 2000 | |
| What was new in 1999 | |
| What was new in 1998 | |
| What was new in 1997 | |
| Latest additions to the Campaign's website | |
|
|